Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Haynes
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Hopkins. Tried below before Hon. Howard Temple-ton, Special District Judge. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
COLLARD, Judge,
Section A.—This is an injunction suit, brought by plaintiff in error, the railway company, against defendant in error, to restrain the collection by execution of an amount added to an original judgment by amendment in the District Court on motion after the term. The amount of the original judgment with all costs was paid by the company, and it is only the amount added to the same by the amended judgment that is sought to be restrained.
The court below, trying the case without a jury, adjudged the judgment as reformed to be valid, and refused to enjoin its collection on final…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blum v. NeilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Stein v. Frieberg, Klein & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1885
- Seymour v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Willis v. GordonTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Ximenes v. XimenesTexas Supreme Court · 1875
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Coleman v. ZappTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Finlay v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Love v. State Bank & Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
- H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. Pais, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
- Wood v. Griffin & Brand of McAllen, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.