Legal Opinion

State v. Swift & Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 21, 1945No. 9481PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice.

The State of Texas instituted this suit against Swift & Company, herein called Swift, an Illinois meat packing corporation with permit to do business in Texas, and against Consumers Cotton Oil Company, herein called Consumers, a Texas corporation engaged in the cottonseed oil mill and gin business in Texas. The State alleged that Swift owns all of the stock of Consumers and so dominates and controls it as to make Swift in fact doing the cottonseed oil mill and gin business in Texas without a permit to do so, in violation of the provision of Art. 1529, R.S.1925, requiring a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. United States v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Lucas v. Texas Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Bell Oil & Gas Co. v. Allied Chemical Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Villagomez v. Rockwood Specialties, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
  4. 3-D Electric Co. v. Barnett Construction Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  5. Hanson Southwest Corp. v. Dal-Mac Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API