Legal Opinion
Dacruz v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 7, 2002No. AC 20884PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*508 Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
In this action, which was commenced pursuant to General Statutes § 38a-321,1 the plaintiff, David J. DaCruz, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm). On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion for summary judgment and (2) granted State Farm’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff argues that the trial court should have rendered summary judgment in his favor. We reverse the judgment of the trial court for the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Mazziotti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Schultz v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dacruz v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Tucker v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Barbarula Ex Rel. Estate of He v. Canal Ins. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Dacruz v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Berube, No. Cv02-05133447s (Jul. 17, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.