Legal Opinion
Barbarula Ex Rel. Estate of He v. Canal Ins. Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 29, 2004No. 3:02-CV-1142(EBB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DEFENDANT CANAL’S SECOND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, and DEFENDANTS THE ROYAL COMPANIES’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BURNS, Senior District Judge.
Michael Barbarula, Administrator of the Estate of Jing Xian He, (“Plaintiff’ or “Barbarula”), moves the Court for Partial Summary Judgment against Canal Insurance Company (“Canal”) as to the validity of a so-denominated “MCS-90” endorsement to Canal’s insurance policy (the “Policy”), at issue herein. [Doc. No. 40]. 1 Plaintiff contends that this obligatory federal endorsement, the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Jose GOENAGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARCH OF DIMES BIRTH DEFECTS FOUNDATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Cora Aldrich v. Randolph Central School District and Cattaraugus County Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Middlesex Insurance v. MaraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Tucker v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Luizzi v. PRO TRANSPORT INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008