Legal Opinion

Grimes v. HOME CREDIT COMPANY OF KINSTON

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 18, 1967No. 367PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff’s first assignment of error is:

“That the court erred in its ruling on the admissibility of evidence, when it refused to allow the plaintiff to testify to a conversation with an employee of the defendant, said conver- .sátion having on a short time' after the plaintiff’s fall and before she left the premises. ExceptioN No. 2 (R. p. 15).”

This statement of th$ assignment ignores Rule 19(3) of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court. An assignment of error to the admission or exclusion of evidence must include so much of that testimony as will enable the Court to understand the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bridges v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Brown v. . Montgomery Ward Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Murrell v. HandleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Branch v. DempseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Barnes v. Hotel O.Henry Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Howard v. K-Mart Discount StoresCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Emerson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Carter v. CarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API