Legal Opinion

Emerson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 19, 1979No. 7815SC815PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLTON, Judge.

The sole question for determination is whether the trial court erred in allowing the motion for summary judgment.

G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c) provides in part as follows:

The [summary] judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.

By the clear language of the rule itself, the motion for summary judgment can be granted only upon a showing by the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Whitley v. CubberlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Raper v. McCRORY-McLELLAN CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Pridgen v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wilhelm v. City of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Hansen v. DHL Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Trexler v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API