Oliver v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public Transportation
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Toal, Justice:
This appeal arises out of Oliver’s action against the South Carolina Department of Highways and Public Transportation (“Highway Department”) for negligence. The issues presented on appeal are whether there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding of proximate cause and whether the trial court erred in taxing costs against the Highway Department. We affirm on the issue of proximate cause and reverse and remand the taxing of costs.
FACTS
On June 1, 1989, Bradford Michael Oliver (“Oliver”) was traveling east on a I^awasaki motorcycle in the outside lane of Highway…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Young Ex Rel. Estate of Young v. Tide Craft, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Bramlette Ex Rel. Estate of Bramlette v. Charter-Medical-ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Matthews v. PorterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Whitlaw v. the Kroger Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Bishop v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Madison Ex Rel. Bryant v. Babcock CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Koester v. Carolina Rental Center, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Vinson v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Small v. Pioneer MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.