Legal Opinion

Oliver v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public Transportation

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 5, 1992No. 23726PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

This appeal arises out of Oliver’s action against the South Carolina Department of Highways and Public Transportation (“Highway Department”) for negligence. The issues presented on appeal are whether there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding of proximate cause and whether the trial court erred in taxing costs against the Highway Department. We affirm on the issue of proximate cause and reverse and remand the taxing of costs.

FACTS

On June 1, 1989, Bradford Michael Oliver (“Oliver”) was traveling east on a I^awasaki motorcycle in the outside lane of Highway…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Young Ex Rel. Estate of Young v. Tide Craft, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. Bramlette Ex Rel. Estate of Bramlette v. Charter-Medical-ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Matthews v. PorterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  5. Whitlaw v. the Kroger Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Bishop v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Madison Ex Rel. Bryant v. Babcock CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Koester v. Carolina Rental Center, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Vinson v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Small v. Pioneer MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API