Legal Opinion

Whitlaw v. the Kroger Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 14, 1991No. 23498PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 46, we agreed to answer the question whether a private cause of action for damages may be instituted under S.C. Code Ann. §§ 61-9-40 1 and 61-9-410(l) 2 (1990) where a minor consumes alcohol purchased by another minor and suffers injuries as a result. We hold that these sections give rise to civil liability only where the violation is used to establish negligence per se, and where the violation is the proximate cause of the minor’s injury.

FACTS

Plaintiff alleges that on November 21,1987, the Defendant, the Kroger Co., sold beer to an underage youth who was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rayfield Ex Rel. Estate of Rayfield v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  2. Bramlette Ex Rel. Estate of Bramlette v. Charter-Medical-ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Scott v. Greenville Pharmacy, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  4. Jamison v. the Pantry, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Oliver v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Baggerly v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Rife v. Hitachi Const. MacHinery Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  4. City of New York v. A-1 Jewelry & Pawn, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  5. Delos Reyes v. KuboyamaHawaii Supreme Court · 1994

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API