Legal Opinion
Frye v. City of Kannapolis
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided April 29, 1999No. 1:99CV00111PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BULLOCK, Chief Judge.
This case is before the court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This matter arises out of an action filed in this court by Plaintiff Jesse Frye against Defendant City of Kannapolis and numerous individual Defendants. In his complaint Plaintiff alleges that a zoning ordinance enacted by Defendants offends the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Defendants have moved to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint on statute of limitation grounds under Rule 12(b)(6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Nano Maldonado v. Tony Harris, in His Capacity as Acting Director of the California Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Slavek v. HinkleDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Lamar Whiteco Outdoor Corp. v. City of West ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- State v. PackinghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
- Town of Beech Mountain v. Genesis Wildlife Sanctuary, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.