State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth Services v. Native Village of Curyung
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Several Alaska Native Villages bring suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the State of Alaska and the Acting Director of the Division of Family and Youth Services. The villages allege ongoing systematic violations of the Adoption Assistance Act and the Indian Child Welfare Act. The superior court dismissed some of them claims, but denied the state’s motion to dismiss all of the villages’ claims. The state appeals. We conclude that the villages may bring suit as parens patriae under § 1983 to enforce rights that are created by the Adoption Assistance…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Waukegan Potawatomi Casino, LLC v. City of WaukeganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
- Douglas Indian Association v. Central Council of Tlingit and Haida Tribes of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Lingley v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Diaz v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.