Douglas Indian Association v. Central Council of Tlingit and Haida Tribes of Alaska
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOLGER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Under the doctrine of tribal sovereign immunity, an Indian tribe is immune from suit unless ■ Congress has' authorized the suit or the tribe has waived its immunity. Relying on this doctrine, the superior court dismissed a complaint by Douglas Indian Association against Central Council of Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska and two Central Council officials. Douglas now argues that the superior court’s action was premature because sovereign immunity is an affirmative defense that should be resolved following discovery. But the federal courts…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Riddle v. LanserAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Evvie Punches v. McCarrey Glenn Apartments LLC and Weidner Property Management LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- McCavit v. LacherAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Yvonne Ito v. Copper River Native AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 2024
- Ronald Oertwich v. Traditional Village of TogiakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.