Legal Opinion

Lingley v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2016No. 7104 S-15529PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPI NION

BOLGER, Justlce

I. INTRODUCTION

A former airline employee sued her former employer for wrongful termination without first attempting to arbitrate her claims under the provisions of <a collective bargaining agreement subject to the federal - Railway Labor Act, The superior court denied the employee leave to amend her complaint, concluding that her claims and proposed claims were precluded by failure to exhaust contractual. remedies and were preempted by the Railway Labor Act. But the collective bargaining agreement does not clearly and unmistakably waive the employee's right to litigate…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kaleb Lee Basey v. State of Alaska, Department of Public Safety, Division of State Troopers, Bureau of InvestigationsAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Keilan Ebli v. State of Alaska, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Miller v. FowlerAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Brent McCormick v. Chippewa, Inc. and Louis OlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Tera Bunton, Personal Representative of the Estate of Helen A. Lingley v. Alaska Airlines, Inc. and Dan KaneAlaska Supreme Court · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API