Mitchell v. Trade Winds Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, Chief Judge.
Before dealing with this appeal on the merits, we consider it appropriate to discuss briefly appellee’s motion to strike certain material printed as an appendix to the appellant’s brief. This appendix consists of letters and memoranda from the files of the Department of Labor offered for the purpose of showing the interpretation given by the Secretary to the exemption here in litigation. We know of no basis on Which it would be legally permissible for such file of correspondence to be injected into litigation at the appellate court level. If such correspondence was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Fleming v. Hawkeye Pearl Button Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Walling v. W. D. Haden Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Waller v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Libby, McNeill & Libby v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mandelkorn v. PatrickDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- Willie X. Ross v. Ralph KempCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- International Business Machines Corp. v. EdelsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Joseph D. BUTTERWORTH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Great American Discount and Credit Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.