TC/American Monorail, Inc. v. Custom Conveyor Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLLINS, Judge.*
In this appeal from judgment following a jury trial, appellant challenges the district court’s denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) or a new trial, arguing that the district court erred by (1) denying JMOL on appellant’s contract claim, (2) denying appellant’s request for commissions or letters rogatory to conduct trial depositions, and (3) excluding certain evidence during trial. We affirm.
FACTS
In 2009, appellant Custom Conveyor Corporation contracted to provide equipment for a wastewater treatment plant in the City of North Las Vegas, Nevada…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Chrysler International Corp. v. John ChemalyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Earl Charles v. F. W. Wade, Leo B. Ryan and City of Savannah, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- TC/American Monorail, Inc. v. Custom Conveyor Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Colder Products Company v. Neologic Solutions, Inc. and Fresh Water Systems, Inc.; Fresh Water Systems, Inc. and Neologic Solutions, Inc. v. Colder Products CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026
- Sterling State Bank v. Maas Commercial Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014