Legal Opinion

Art Goebel, Inc. v. Array Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 21, 1989No. CX-88-2162PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

Following an arbitration award, the trial court granted summary judgment against appellant’s district court claims.

FACTS

In 1979, appellant Art Goebel, Inc. contracted with general contractor Arkay Construction Co. (Arkay) for construction of a new building. Arkay subcontracted with respondent Video, Inc. for the masonry work; Video purchased concrete blocks from respondent Anchor Block Co. (Anchor).

Two years after completion, Anchor was required to perform cosmetic repair on the building due to faulty blocks. Two years later it was discovered that this repair was not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Houlihan v. FimonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Houlihan v. FimonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Houlihan v. FimonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API