Legal Opinion

State v. Sommerville

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 22, 2013No. 20081042-CAPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROTH, Judge:

[ 1 This case originated as an interlocutory appeal from the district court's denial of Defendant Troy Munk Sommerville's motion to dismiss a felony charge for driving under the influence (DUI). In State v. Sommerville, 2010 UT App 336, 248 P.3d 50, reh'g granted (Feb. 15, 2011), we reversed, concluding that Utah Code sections 76-1-401, -402 and -403 (the Single Criminal Episode Statute or the Statute), which bar multiple prosecutions of offenses that arise out of a single criminal episode, barred prosecution of the felony DUI offense in the district court. Id. 1. Following…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Oman v. Davis School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. MacK v. Utah State Department of CommerceUtah Supreme Court · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pierucci v. PierucciCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  2. State v. RirieUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Fowler v. TeynorCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  4. Cook v. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  5. Heywood v. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API