State v. Ririe
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Associate Chief Justice LEE,
opinion of the Court:
1 In this case we are asked to interpret the terms of Utah Code section 76-1-403, which adopts a principle of criminal claim preclusion for certain offenses arising out of a "single criminal episode." The preclusive effect of section 408 is invoked where a "defendant has been prosecuted for one or more offenses arising out of a single criminal episode," "the subsequent prosecution is for an offense that was or should have been tried under Subsection 76-1-402(2)," and the "former prosecution" resulted in an acquittal or conviction or was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Olsen v. Eagle Mountain CityUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- McArthur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
- Hughes General Contractors, Inc. v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- Myers v. MyersUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. AraveUtah Supreme Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Craig v. Provo CityUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- Salt Lake City v. JosephsonUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- Faucheaux v. Provo CityUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- DIRECTV v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Rawcliffe v. AnciauxUtah Supreme Court · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.