Legal Opinion

State v. Ririe

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 2015No. 20120638PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Associate Chief Justice LEE,

opinion of the Court:

1 In this case we are asked to interpret the terms of Utah Code section 76-1-403, which adopts a principle of criminal claim preclusion for certain offenses arising out of a "single criminal episode." The preclusive effect of section 408 is invoked where a "defendant has been prosecuted for one or more offenses arising out of a single criminal episode," "the subsequent prosecution is for an offense that was or should have been tried under Subsection 76-1-402(2)," and the "former prosecution" resulted in an acquittal or conviction or was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Olsen v. Eagle Mountain CityUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. McArthur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Hughes General Contractors, Inc. v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Myers v. MyersUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. AraveUtah Supreme Court · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Craig v. Provo CityUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Salt Lake City v. JosephsonUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Faucheaux v. Provo CityUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  4. DIRECTV v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Rawcliffe v. AnciauxUtah Supreme Court · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API