Legal Opinion

McKenzie v. Cutter

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

1. Was the “contract to make a will” ambiguous? The first question to be determined ott this appeal is whether the “contract to make a will” is ambiguous. The general rule on whether a contract is to be considered ambiguous is well stated in 12 Am. Jur., Contracts, p. 752, sec. 229:

“It has been said that it is only where the language of a contract is ambiguous and uncertain and susceptible of more than one construction, that a court may, under the well-established rules of construction, interfere to reach a proper construction and make certain that which in itself is uncertain. Where the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Megal v. KohlhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Hoffman v. Eastern Wisconsin Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Bank of Sheboygan v. FesslerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Ketay v. GorensteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Crolius v. LorgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goebel v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Peiffer v. Allstate Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Bruns v. Rennebohm Drug Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  4. Farley v. SalowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Bruns v. Rennebohm Drug Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API