Legal Opinion
McKenzie v. Cutter
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 2, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
1. Was the “contract to make a will” ambiguous? The first question to be determined ott this appeal is whether the “contract to make a will” is ambiguous. The general rule on whether a contract is to be considered ambiguous is well stated in 12 Am. Jur., Contracts, p. 752, sec. 229:
“It has been said that it is only where the language of a contract is ambiguous and uncertain and susceptible of more than one construction, that a court may, under the well-established rules of construction, interfere to reach a proper construction and make certain that which in itself is uncertain. Where the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Megal v. KohlhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Hoffman v. Eastern Wisconsin Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Bank of Sheboygan v. FesslerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Ketay v. GorensteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Crolius v. LorgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Goebel v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Peiffer v. Allstate Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Bruns v. Rennebohm Drug Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- Farley v. SalowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Bruns v. Rennebohm Drug Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989