Legal Opinion

Crolius v. Lorge

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

There are two crucial questions presented in this case. The first involves the construction of the agreement, and the second involves the question of whether the provision of the agreement requiring a written notice by mail has been waived.

Ordinarily in an agreement of this kind the amount paid for an option consists of a nominal sum paid to bind the bargain and to make the option legally operative. The sum paid on this agreement was substantial, notwithstanding the total consideration for the land amounted to $42,500. The sum of $2,500 paid when the option was extended is some evidence that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curtis Land & Loan Co. v. Interior Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Harrass v. EdwardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Geray v. Mahnomen Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Northern Illinois Coal Corp. v. CryderIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Georgiades v. GlickmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Clear View Estates, Inc. v. VeitchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Clark v. MuirheadMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Greiling v. GenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API