Legal Opinion

Bank of Sheboygan v. Fessler

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1935PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

This is an action at law on a promissory note. A note and mortgage were executed at the same time, and under the law of this state the payee has a choice of remedies. It may elect to sue on the note or foreclose the mortgage, these actions can be instituted at the same time; or the payee can combine the two in an action seeking foreclosure and a deficiency judgment. Neither the nature of this action on the note, nor the right to maintain it, is affected by the fact that the note is secured by a mortgage, except as stipulations in the mortgage may become a part of the contract provisions of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thorp v. MindemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Hanauer v. Republic Building Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Seaman v. McNamaraWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Royal Palm Corporate Center Ass'n v. PNC Bank, NADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Helbig v. BonsnessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. O'Connor Oil Corp. v. WarberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. McKenzie v. CutterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Keller Implement Co. v. EitingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API