Goldey v. Bierman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, William Bierman, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 24th day of March, 1922, removing an action pending in the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, Fifth District, wherein William Bierman is plaintiff and Abert Goldey is defendant, to the Supreme Court and consolidating that action with this action.
1Opinion of the Court
Dowling, J.:
This action was begun by the personal service of the summons and complaint herein upon the defendant on November 26, 1921, and is brought for the dissolution of a copartnership between the parties entered into on or about August 15, 1921, whereby they became copartners under the name “ New York Urologic Institute,” and for an accounting of the said copartnership, as well as for a sale of its assets. After the service of the summons and complaint herein, and on November 29, 1921, the defendant herein caused to be served upon the plaintiff in this action a summons and complaint in…
2Cited by25 opinions
- Peck v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Gibbs v. SokolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Lee v. SchmeltzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Philip Shlansky & Bro. v. GrossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Dilworth v. Yellow Taxi Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.