Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Sunset Estate Properties, L.L.C. v. Village of Lodi
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 10, 2015No. 2013-1856PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, J.
{¶ 1} In this case, we are asked to determine whether Section 1280.05(a) of the zoning code of the village of Lodi is unconstitutional on its face. We conclude that a portion of it is.
*352Facts and Procedural History
{¶ 2} The facts in this case are largely undisputed by the parties. Appellees, Sunset Estate Properties, L.L.C., and Meadowview Village, Inc., each own property in the village of Lodi on which they operate licensed manufactured-home parks (also called “mobile-home parks” herein). Both properties are in areas currently zoned as R-2 Districts, and R-2 Districts do not permit…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Bonacorsi v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. HochhauslerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. DelvallieOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. Noling (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Guardianship of Sebastien ChamberlainSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
- Athens v. McClain (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Center for Powell Crossing, LLC v. City of PowellDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.