Legal Opinion

Boone v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 20, 2002No. 02-345CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*732 ORDER

MILLER, Judge.

Proceeding pro se, plaintiff claims that he is due back pay for the period after his enlistment expired and while he was awaiting court-martial and a correction of his records to reflect that he became a reservist after his enlistment expired. Defendant interposes a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(6).1 Although plaintiff has moved for summary judgment, the court deems, having considered all the briefs filed by both parties, that the case should be resolved based on defendant’s motion. Argument is deemed…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  2. McClellan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API