Peever v. City Com'rs of Florence
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICE, Judge.
It is enough to say, in disposing of this appeal, that the prosecution is for a violation of an ordinance of the city of Florence ; and that, Code 1923, § 3258, not applying (Casteel v. City of Decatur, 215 Ala. 4, 109 So. 571), and there being no assignment of error “written upon the transcript,” in accordance with Supreme Court Rule of Practice No. 1 (Code 1923, vol. 4, p. 880) there is nothing presented for our decision. Halle v. Brooks, 209 Ala. 486, 96 So. 341.
It seems anomalous to affirm a judgment which is clearly erroneous (Wright v. City of Bessemer, 209 Ala. 374, 96 So.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Halle v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Casteel v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Casteel v. City of DecaturAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- Wright v. City of BessemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brackin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
- Arnold v. City of MobileAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
- Lindsey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
- Ashley v. City of ScottsboroAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947