Legal Opinion

Casteel v. City of Decatur

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 6, 1926No. 8 Div. 864PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouddin, J.

A city ordinance declaring “any person or persons committing an offense prohibited by the laws of the state of Alabama” guilty of a misdemeanor, and prescribing the punishment under the ordinance, applies to offenses against the state law in force at the time of the offense, and not at the time the ordinance was enacted. Whether the state law was in force when the ordinance was enacted is immaterial.

The thought behind the ordinance is that he who offends the peace and dignity of the parent state, by infraction of her penal laws, offends also against the laws of the local government.

Such…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ramish v. HartwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Gaston v. LamkinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Town of Camden v. BlochSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  4. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Goldsmith v. Mayor of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Shelby County Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. City of Mobile v. McCown Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Howard v. City of BessemerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Donley v. City of Mountain BrookCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Lane v. McFadyenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API