Legal Opinion
Halle v. Brooks
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 26, 1923No. 6 Div. 857PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The complaint contained four counts, namely, account, account stated, for goods and merchandise sold, and for work and labor done. Defendant pleaded the general issue and payment. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and judgment was for defendant".
No question is reserved for decision not. embraced in a due assignment of error. Sup. Ct. Rules 1-3 (Code 1907, pp. 1506, 1507). There is no question as to the introduction of evidence presented under the general terms of the assignment of errors. Cobb v. Malone, 92 Ala. 630, 633, 9 South. 738.
When a civil case is tried by the court…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Hackett v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Syndicate Insurance v. CatchingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Woodrow v. HawvingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Southern States Fire Ins. v. KronenbergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Wood v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Kennedy v. Western Sizzlin Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte FosheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Congress of Industrial Organizations v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Wetzel v. HobbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.