Legal Opinion

Arnold v. City of Mobile

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1947No. 1 Div. 537PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

This cause originated in the Recorder’s Court, where appellant was charged with the violation of a city ordinance. Upon conviction there he took an appeal to the circuit court. The instant appeal follows . a judgment of conviction in the latter jurisdiction.

Appellant’s counsel has not filed a brief in this court; neither do we find any errors duly assigned.

Prosecutions for the violations of municipal ordinances are in their nature quasi criminal, and on appeal the appellate courts are controlled by the rules pertaining to civil cases insofar as assignments of error are concerned.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Casteel v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Casteel v. City of DecaturAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Gentle v. City of HuntsvilleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Peever v. City Com'rs of FlorenceAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parks v. City of MontgomeryAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Ellis v. City of SylacaugaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Freeman v. City of MontgomeryAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API