Legal Opinion

United States v. Newbold

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 27, 1996No. 95-0645; Crim. App. No. 93-1432PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*110 Opinion of the Court

CRAWFORD, Judge:

Pursuant to his pleas, appellant was convicted at Naval Base, Charleston, South Carolina, of conspiracy to commit rape, rape, forceful sodomy, indecent assault, committing indecent acts, and kidnapping, in violation of Articles 81, 120, 125, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 881, 920, 925 and 934, respectively. He was sentenced by the military judge to a dishonorable discharge, 15 years’ confinement, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, the convening authority approved the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. AyalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  3. Faison v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  5. United States v. RosserUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. SeayCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  3. United States v. ThomasU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  4. United States v. CorralezUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  5. United States v. BradleyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API