Legal Opinion
Tindell v. Murphy
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided April 6, 2018No. C081424PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRaye, P.J.
*1241Plaintiffs Randy and Linda Tindell bought a single family manufactured home from defendant Linda Murphy in 2005 for $320,000. Defendant Christine Bradley provided the appraisal. In 2009 the Tindells were unable to refinance the mortgage because it is a manufactured home, not a modular home. The Tindells filed a fourth amended complaint alleging Murphy and Bradley failed to disclose defects in the property and acted in concert with others in order to conceal these defects and profit from the sale of the property. The trial court sustained Murphy's demurrer without leave to amend. Subsequently,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Gomes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Apollo Capital Fund, LLC v. Roth Capital Partners, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- First Nationwide Savings v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Carnes v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ward v. Tilly's, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Banks v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Borman v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Everhart v. Trapac CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Gonzales v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.