Legal Opinion

Sugarman v. Olsen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1969PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

Plaintiffs secured a judgment of ejectment. The defendant had alleged in his answer that if plaintiffs were successful the defendant should be awarded the value of improvements that defendant had made to the land from which plaintiffs sought to eject him. The defendant was awarded $3,000 for such claim. The only issue on this appeal by plaintiffs is whether defendant was entitled to a judgment in any amount. ①

Plaintiffs’ principal contention is that in an action for ejectment in which plaintiffs did not seek damages for the withholding of the property the defendant cannot in either law or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rogue River Management Co. v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Gabel v. ArmstrongOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Bradley v. CornwallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  4. Winkleman v. Oregon-Washington Plywood Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Lawrence v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Phillips v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Coos County v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Fouser v. PaigeIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Kerr v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Cooley v. FredinburgCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API