Legal Opinion

Cooley v. Fredinburg

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 19, 1997No. 88-0971-J-1; CA A89024PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Appellant Fredinburg and respondent Hogue Investment Corporation (Hogue) separately petition for reconsideration of our decision in this case, in which we concluded that Fredinburg was entitled to judgment against Hogue in the amount of $9,837. Cooley v. Fredinburg, 144 Or App 410, 927 P2d 124 (1996) (Cooley II). 1 We grant reconsideration of both petitions, increase the amount of Fredinburg’s judgment to $12,723, and otherwise adhere to our previous opinion.

We quote the facts from our previous opinion:

“Fredinburg is the owner of real property that was subject to several liens. The senior…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lytle v. Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Coos County v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Jensen v. ProbertOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Cooley v. FredinburgCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Comer v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hiber v. Creditors Collection Service of Lincoln County, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Weatherspoon v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Kerr v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Montoya v. Housing Authority of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Skeen v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API