Legal Opinion
Francis v. County of Stanislaus
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 1967No. Civ. 715PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
H. L. Francis and Merrill D. Price, who describe themselves as . . operators of eardrooms . . . brought this suit to restrain the County of Stanislaus, Dan Kelsay, its sheriff, and Alexander M. Wolfe, its district attorney, from prosecuting them for any breach of an ordinance adopted by vote of the people of Stanislaus County relative to gambling in commercial eardrooms in the County of Stanislaus. As the theory of the plaintiffs was that the ordinance was unconstitutional and, therefore, void, and that the potential threat of arrest irreparably damaged them in the conduct of their alleged…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Murphy v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- In Re HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rubio v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Cristmat, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Johnson v. Department of Social ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- City of Los Angeles v. SilverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Harriman v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.