Hegeman Farms Corporation v. Baldwin
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The decision of the Supreme Court on March 5, 1934 (Nebbia v. People of State of New York, 54 S. Ct. 505, 78 L. Ed. -) declaring constitutional the “Milk Control Law” of New York (chapter 158 of the Laws of 1933, Agriculture and Markets Law [Consol. Laws, e. 69] § 300 et seq.), has answered the first cause of suit alleged in this bill of complaint. The court there held that the regulation of the price of milk by the “Milk Control Board” was lawful, and that its orders could be enforced. The second cause of suit remains, which is that the Board has in administering this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Prendergast v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hegeman Farms Corp. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Royal Farms Dairy, Inc. v. WallaceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1934
- Dairy Sealed, Inc. v. Ten EyckNew York Supreme Court · 1936