Legal Opinion

Dairy Sealed, Inc. v. Ten Eyck

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCotillo, J.

Plaintiff, a duly licensed milk dealer engaged in the sale of fluid milk and cream in the city of New York and vicinity, seeks to enjoin the enforcement of Official Order No. Ill promulgated by the Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets on May 28, 1936, under the authority of section 258-m of article 21-A of the Agriculture and Markets Law. That order was to become effective on June 1, 1936. Upon the application of plaintiff, Mr. Justice Carew issued a temporary restraining order to continue until the hearing of the present motion. The administrative order of which complaint is made fixes…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Schieffelin v. Valentine KomfortNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Hegeman Farms Corp. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. BORDEN’S FARM PRODUCTS CO., INC. v. TEN EYCK, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE & MARKETS OF NEW YORK, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Security Mills of Asheville, Inc. v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API