Legal Opinion

Aiena v. Olsen

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 12, 1999No. 97 Civ. 8713(LAK), 98 Civ. 5549(LAK)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KAPLAN, District Judge.

In March 1997, Johnson & Higgins (“J & H”), a well known and closely held insurance firm, was sold to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (“Marsh”) for aggregate consideration valued at $1.8 billion. Plaintiffs, former J & H director-shareholders who retired prior to the Marsh deal and, upon retirement, sold their J & H shares back to the company for certificates entitling them to receive for ten years payments equivalent to dividends on the shares they sold, were paid nearly $300 million for their certificates as part of the transaction. They claim, however, that…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. G-I Holdings, Inc. v. Baron & BuddDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  2. Sanders v. Gravel Products, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Searles v. First Fortis Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  4. Nelson v. StahlDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  5. Miller v. AsensioDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API