Legal Opinion
Miller v. Asensio
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided June 16, 2000No. C/A 2:99-1861-18PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORTON, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, this court denies Defendants’ motion.
I. Factual Background 1
A. The Players
Plaintiffs Joe Miller and Robert Pearce allege that they were shareholders and owners of common stock of Chromatics Color Sciences International, Inc. (CCSI)-Defendant Manuel Asensio is a stock research analyst in New York City. Defendant Asensio and Company is a New York-based investment bank and securities brokerage firm engaged in the business of trading securities for its own account and…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Superintendent of Insurance of New York v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hsin Ten Enterprise USA, Inc. v. Clark EnterprisesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- D'ADDARIO v. GellerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Schultz v. AryDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
- High River Ltd. Partnership v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Iron Workers Local 16 Pension Fund v. Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.