Legal Opinion
G-I Holdings, Inc. v. Baron & Budd
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 17, 2002No. 01 Civ. 0216(RWS)PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant law firms Baron & Budd, Ness Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole (“Ness Motley”), and Weitz & Lux-enberg, and individual defendants Russell Budd (“Budd”), Frederick Baron (“Baron”), Ronald Motley (“Motley”), Joseph Rice (“Rice”), Perry Weitz (‘Weitz”) and Robert Gordon (“Gordon”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) have moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for an order dismissing portions of the Third Amended Complaint of G-l Holdings (“Holdings”). In addition, the Ness Motley defendants (the law firm and individual defendants Ness…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Copantitla v. Fiskardo Estiatorio, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- RSM PRODUCTION CORP. v. FridmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Oram v. SoulCycle LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Negrete v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.