Legal Opinion

Laurel County v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 8, 1920PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Laurel Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Quin

Affirming.

For $60.00, and the further consideration of the benefit to be derived by the grantor through the extension of the Knoxville branch of the L. & N. E. E. Co., through Laurel county, J. G. Moore and wife conveyed to the railroad company an unconditional right of way through their property.

After constructing, and for a number of years operating, a line of railroad over said right of way the company abandoned the same. In February, 1912, condemnation proceedings were instituted against all the owners of property along said route for the purpose of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Abercrombie v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GeiselIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Jones v. Van BochoveMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Flaten v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. Walker v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sherman v. Petroleum ExplorationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  2. Tamalpais Land & Water Co. v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Mammoth Cave National Park Ass'n v. State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  4. L. & G. Realty & Construction Co. v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Barton v. JarvisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API