Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. Geisel

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1889No. 12,449PublishedCited by 52 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, C. J. —

The question in this case is this: Did the deed of Gilbert McCoy vest in the appellant’s grantor an estate in fee to the land described in it ? The deed reads thus:

“Release of Right of Way.
“ I, Gilbert McCoy, of the county of Marion, and State of Indiana, for and in consideration of the advantages which *78may or will result to the public in general and myself in . particular, by the construction of the Lawreneeburgh and Upper Mississippi Railroad, as now surveyed, or as the same may be finally located, and for the purpose of facilitating the construction and completion of said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wild v. DeigIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Williams v. Western Union Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Bodfish v. BodfishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Indianapolis & Vincennes Railroad v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Pfaff v. Terre Haute & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Uhl v. Ohio River RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Abercrombie v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Stevens v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  4. Macy Elevator, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Ross, Inc. v. LeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1964

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API