Legal Opinion

In Re Miller

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 3, 1953No. 4185PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

Laws 1949, c. 314, s. 4, provides that the board appointed by the Superior Court shall “. . . examine forthwith the alleged sexual psychopath or the one accused of one or more of the sex offenses stated in paragraph I (1) of section 3 ... to ascertain whether the person is a sexual psychopath.” This is statutory recognition of the fact that the determination of sex deviation is based primarily on medical evidence (Ex parte Kader, 334 Mich. 339), although the statute makes the final determination a judicial one. Section 5 V; In re Mundy, 97 N. H. 239. Physical and mental examinations conducted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. The People v. RedlichIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Commonwealth v. DiStasioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. State Ex Rel. Sweezer v. GreenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  5. In Re KaderMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Director of Patuxent Institution v. DANIELS OF PATUXENT INSTITUTIONCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Proctor v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. People v. McVeayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Sas v. State of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1969
  5. In re SanbornSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API