People v. Dowding
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
Appellant pursues an erroneous procedure when he attempts to set aside that portion of a judgment adjudicating him an habitual criminal by means of a writ in the nature of coram nobis. Whatever substance there may be to appellant’s basic position, he can properly present it solely by application for a writ of habeas corpus.
The case arises from appellant’s appeal from the denial of a motion to annul, vacate, and set aside that portion of a judgment of October 27,1930, adjudicating him as an habitual criminal. Appellant was tried and convicted upon the charge of robbery in the first degree and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. ShortsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- In Re SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re LuceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. GriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. PainterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. QuigleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. QuigleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.