Legal Opinion

People v. Dowding

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1960No. Crim. 3798PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

Appellant pursues an erroneous procedure when he attempts to set aside that portion of a judgment adjudicating him an habitual criminal by means of a writ in the nature of coram nobis. Whatever substance there may be to appellant’s basic position, he can properly present it solely by application for a writ of habeas corpus.

The case arises from appellant’s appeal from the denial of a motion to annul, vacate, and set aside that portion of a judgment of October 27,1930, adjudicating him as an habitual criminal. Appellant was tried and convicted upon the charge of robbery in the first degree and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. ShortsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. In Re SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. People v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re LuceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. GriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. PainterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. People v. QuigleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. People v. QuigleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API