Legal Opinion
People v. Griggs
California Supreme Court
Decided September 14, 1967No. Crim. 10692PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Petitioner applies, pursuant to rule 31(a) of the California Rules of Court, for leave to file a late notice of appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate his judgment of conviction.
The parties have stipulated to the facts. According to the stipulation, petitioner, a parolee, was charged with rape accomplished by force or violence. (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. 3.) He pleaded not guilty, but subsequently he was allowed to plead guilty to assault. (Pen. Code, § 240.) On July 26, 1965, petitioner was sentenced to three months in the county jail. He did not appeal. In September petitioner’s…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- People v. ShipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- In Re HorowitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Henry Franklin Boruff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Jesus Nino v. George Galaza, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. LavergneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Bloom v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re DapperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.