Legal Opinion

Portland Wood Pipe Co. v. Slick Bros. Const.

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided April 19, 1915PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Portland Wood Pipe Company against the Slick Bros. Construction Company and others, in which one Comer-ford filed a cross-bill. On motion to dismiss the counterclaim of the Construction Company to such cross-bill.

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, District Judge.

[1] The question submitted is of such character that it may be stated in the abstract, without particular reference to the concrete facts of this case. In a suit for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien, brought by a nonresident of the district as plaintiff, to enforce a claim for material furnished for the construction of an irrigation system within the district, not only against the owner, but also the contractor and a subcontractor, as defendants, resident citizens of the district, if the subcontractor in a cross-bill asserts a lien claim upon the property for a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Electric Boat Co. v. Lake Torpedo Boat Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
  2. Lilienthal v. McCormickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
  3. Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. National Electric Signaling Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1913
  4. United States Expansion Bolt Co. v. H. G. Kroncke Hardware Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1914
  5. United States v. MackeyDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alexander v. HillmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Barnett v. MayesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  3. Caflisch v. HumbleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  4. Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  5. Kreitmeyer v. Baldwin Drainage Dist.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API