Legal Opinion

Moore v. New York Cotton Exchange

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 17, 1923No. 40PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). It appears that the New York Cotton Exchange provides an exchange room in the city of New York where its members meet and make contracts for themselves or as brokers for customers, for the purchase and sale of cotton for future deliveries. Their transactions aggregate many million bales of .cotton annually. The contracts are made on the Exchange between 10 a. m. and 3 p. m. by open viva voce'bidding. It claims that the knowledge of the prices upon which these contracts are based constitute a peculiar kind of property and that their value depends on the…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  4. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Waring v. WDAS Broadcasting Station, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Hann v. Venetian Blind CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
  4. Carter Oil Co. v. WoodDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1940
  5. McQuillen v. National Cash Register Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API