Lilienthal v. McCormick
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Oregon. The controversy between the parties in this case depends upon the construction to be given to the terms of the following agreement: “Articles of agreement made this 12th day of September, one thousand eight hundred and ninety-six, between Chas.
Read the full summary
Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Oregon. The controversy between the parties in this case depends upon the construction to be given to the terms of the following agreement: “Articles of agreement made this 12th day of September, one thousand eight hundred and ninety-six, between Chas. McCormick, Wong Him, Jim Lip, and Ah Tong, all of Woodburn, county of Marion, state of Oregon, parties of the first part, and Lilienthal Brothers, of the city, county, and state of New York, parties of the second part. “The parties of the first part have bargained and sold,…
1Opinion of the CourtHawley, District Judge
i. This suit was brought by Lilienthal Bros., against McCormick et al., upon the contract set out in the foregoing statement, to enjoin them from removing the hops grown upon the premises of McCormick during the year 1897, and from selling or disposing of said hops; for the appointment of a receiver to take possession of and store and take care of the same; that the contract between the parties be declared a lien upon the hops in favor of complainants to the extent of the money advanced by them to defendants, with interest, and for all damages sustained by reason of the failure of the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Freeman v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Scott v. NeelySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Krippendorf v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railroad & Steamship Co. v. Texas Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kimel v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Johnson v. Riverland Levee Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Rainier Nat. Park Co. v. MartinDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1937
- Heinze v. Butte & Boston Consolidated Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- City of Orangeburg v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.