Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Marietta Educ. Ass'n
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 14, 2019No. Case No. 2:18-cv-628PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Jade Thompson ("Plaintiff") sues the Marietta Education Association ("the Union") and Marietta Board of Education ("the Board") (collectively, "Defendants") under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. She argues that Ohio Revised Code § 4117.04 -05 is unconstitutional and moves for a preliminary injunction prohibiting Defendants from recognizing the Union as Plaintiff's representative. The State filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the statute. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion.
I. FACTS
The following facts are taken from…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Janus v. State, County, and Municipal EmployeesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hendrickson v. AFSCME Council 18District Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
- Warner v. Chambers-SmithDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025