Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 23, 1981No. SPCM 15633PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JONES, Senior Judge:

The appellant entered a plea of guilty to seven specifications alleging use, possession, and sale of marihuana (hashish) in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934, but the trial judge rejected the plea because the appellant declined to name his drug supplier. The appellant alleges the judge abused his discretion and we agree.

During the course of the guilty plea inquiry, the trial judge asked the appellant to *674name his supplier but the appellant responded that he did not wish to divulge the name because he feared…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. MoselyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. HughesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  4. United States v. KazenaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  5. United States v. GriffinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. PenisterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. HaynesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. JohnsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  4. United States v. HolmesNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
  5. United States v. AumanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API