United States v. Johnson
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JONES, Senior Judge:
The appellant entered a plea of guilty to seven specifications alleging use, possession, and sale of marihuana (hashish) in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934, but the trial judge rejected the plea because the appellant declined to name his drug supplier. The appellant alleges the judge abused his discretion and we agree.
During the course of the guilty plea inquiry, the trial judge asked the appellant to *674name his supplier but the appellant responded that he did not wish to divulge the name because he feared…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. MoselyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. HughesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
- United States v. KazenaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. GriffinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. PenisterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. HaynesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. JohnsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. HolmesNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
- United States v. AumanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.