Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided October 21, 1987No. ACMR 8700210PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON RECONSIDERATION

CARMICHAEL, Judge:

Pursuant to his pleas, appellant was found guilty by a military judge sitting as a special court-martial of two specifications *554of absence without leave and three specifications of dishonorable failure to pay-debts. His sentence to a bad-conduct discharge and reduction to Private E-l was approved by the convening authority.

Appellant contends and we agree that his pleas of guilty to the three specifications of failure to pay debts are improvident. We conclude that appellant’s comments at trial set up matters inconsistent with his pleas…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. JemmingsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. PenisterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. TimminsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  5. United States v. LeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. BrooksU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  2. United States v. SpragueU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  3. United States v. GunterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. GirouxU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  5. United States v. WilliamsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API