United States v. Hughes
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLETCHER, Chief Judge:
We granted the appellant’s petition to reexamine whether simultaneous multiple drug possession offenses may be separately punished where all the charges allege a violation of the same lawful general regulation, specifically Army Regulation 600-50. In United States v. Meyer, 21 U.S.C.M.A. 310, 312, 45 C.M.R. 84, 86 (1972), a majority of this Court assumed, “without deciding, that separate acts of misconduct . . . [could] become so connected in place, circumstances, and time as to merge into a single offense. Cf. United States v. Smith, 17 U.S.C.M.A.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Gore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. MartinDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. MoselyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. LedbetterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. FrangoulesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- United States v. GashU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.