Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Haynes

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided September 28, 1989No. ACMR 8800487PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

VARO, Judge:

Appellant was convicted by a general court-martial consisting of officer and enlisted members of assault with a dangerous weapon and assault with intent to inflict grievous bodily harm, violations of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 928 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for one year, forfeiture of $250.00 pay per month for twelve months, and reduction to El.

Appellant’s first assignment of error is that he was substantially prejudiced by the improper testimony of his company commander.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. HornerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. SherrodUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. BrightU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985
  5. United States v. JohnsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. FreemanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  2. United States v. WolfeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. GoodenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. WinterU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. United States v. LawsonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API